环境,植物,动物,人

亚当吃苹果后变成了“植物人”(注意,还是人),外界给什么刺激就做什么反应,对环境没有一点掌控;耶和华是动物,对环境有一定掌控,可以选择做出特定的反应(responses),因此人类整体(包括亚当和耶和华的世界)还处于婴儿阶段,还没有到真正的人格阶段,不能称之为真正的人。动物迷失在各种反应(responses)中,人迷失在各种物中,人对环境有完全的掌控,可以称之为真正的自由。

因此,我们,作为亚当的后代,也继承了他的inertia,即做不出任何行为(unable to act),完全看外界什么情况就做什么反应。耶稣给的是生命,即脱离植物人状态。

但是zubiri让我对耶稣计划的第二步产生了怀疑(第一步获得生命,第二步复活身体),即耶稣对世界真正完成的只是第一步(给了亚当的世界生命),第二步或许只有部分人能做到。或许第二部只是幻影(illusion),因为我现在觉得地球不只是密度世界的中心,甚至是耶和华世界的中心,耶和华世界和密度世界都只是美好的幻影,地球是根基。

但是有问题还没弄明白:self-seeking为什么是inertia?

1 Like

但是基督教的发言人Hinton说过:我们这个世界其实就是being的世界本身,只不过我们有inertia,看到世界是这个样子。

1 Like

或许这和快感和受苦密不可分,是六密度个体的恐惧更大(害怕失去六密度的美好/快感)还是地球的奴隶恐惧更大?战胜恐惧(比如抓住快感不放)或许是迈向自由的一大步

1 Like

如果现在让我从密度世界和基督教世界两者选择,我想和耶稣混。或许两者都不选择,地球自成一派。

最近地球上的大家正在遭遇前所未有的精神危机,我很想马上把这些书让全世界都知道缓解大家的痛苦,但是貌似这样做是不太恰当的。虽然我也不知道真相和意义是什么,但是我知道有真相和意义这么个东西存在。在黑暗中探索越久,照亮的一刻就越闪耀。证据就是Xavier Zubiri和James Hinton.

发现Ra的这句话和Zubiri很相似:

  1. Zubiri: When the stimuli do not suffice for a suitable response, man suspends, so to speak, his response and, without abandoning the stimulus, but rather conserving it, apprehends it according as it is in itself, as something de suyo, as stimulating reality. That is, he apprehends the stimulus, but not as mere stimulus: this is the radical dawn of intellection. Intellection arises precisely and formally at the moment of transcending or going beyond mere stimulus, at the moment of apprehending something real as real when pure sensing is suspended.
  2. Ra:The entity polarizing positively perceives the anger. This entity, if using this catalyst mentally, blesses and loves this anger in itself. It then intensifies this anger consciously in mind alone until the folly of this redray energy is perceived not as folly in itself but as energy subject to spiritual entropy due to the randomness of energy being used.
    Positive orientation then provides the will and faith to continue this mentally intense experience of letting the anger be understood, accepted, and integrated with the mind/body/spirit complex. The other-self which is the object of anger is thus transformed into an object of acceptance, understanding, and accommodation, all being reintegrated using the great energy which anger began. – 46.9
1 Like

基督教的God,Yahweh,作为一个生命体,应该是发烧了,而Yahweh作为一个生命体能感受到他体内每一个细胞的想法,而这一个个细胞包括serpent(病变细胞)和Adam(被感染的细胞)。为什么说发烧了呢?见:

Zubiri: But neither reality nor my sensing are exhausted in these types of sentient apprehension. Above all, we must consider heat and cold; they are the primary presentation of reality as temperant. There is in addition the apprehension of reality not simply as temperant but also as affectant: sorrow and pleasure are the primary expression of that affection. Reality is temperant and affectant.

可见reality被感官感受到的两种形式:(热,冷)(快感,悲伤)是绑定的?现象界的快感来自于热(太阳/Logos),细胞变成了喜热的而不是健康的?所以应该是发烧了。

说Yahweh是有一个个细胞组成的一个生命体是由以下一句话启发的:

There is another mode of experience which consists, not in making a thing show us its own nature by some provocation of ours, but in the attempt to be present, so to speak, at the vision of the real achieved based on its own interiority. To be sure, the merely material reality of an atom or molecule is not viable in this form; but it is something possible and real when dealing with living realities and above all human realities. This being present is grounded upon an installation of the one experiencing in {250} the experiential; it is what I call compenetration.

1 Like

但我想了想,这不就是斯多葛主义嘛(stoicism)?或者,这和过度发展科技导致把情感玩没的灰人有何区别呢?昴宿星人说地球人的情感范围是宇宙最广的,所以zubiri说的一定不是灰人这种情况。

The autonomization in which formalization
consists has become changed into hyperautonomization in
man, i.e., it has been changed from sign into reality. With this, the catalog of possible suitable responses to a stimulus becomes practically indeterminate.

Indeterminate, then, does not here mean indefinite, because being indefinite is a mode of determination. Indetermination means rather “un-defined”. “Un-defined” is not the same as “indefinite”. In virtue of that, the ambit of
the indeterminate is constitutively open without limits; it is open to everything else.

可以看出,Zubiri基本上是在说真正的人对物的反应是无限多种的。

Vital tone itself acquires nuances through formalization. A general feeling of well-being or malaise acquires nuances through mere formalization: a mode of feeling spiritless or full of life, spiritless in one direction but {41} not in others, a tonality of happiness, etc.—and all of this according to qualities and in degrees or diverse forms.

可见Zubiri把spiritless, happiness归到了vital tone里,所以灰人那种属于spiritless(其实我觉得现在的人类社会也是这样的),是一种动物情感,而真正的人看到某物可以选择我感受它为好玩的/无聊的/…(无限种),而我们密度宇宙对物是完全无法选择我想感受什么就感受什么的。

那怎么样才能成长成人呢?这一切的终极目的又是什么呢?虽然Zubiri讨论了"what for"(为什么,即目的)和truth-making(真相产生),但我还没看太明白。如果是通过以下方式成长的话:即体验无数方向的无数经历,来知晓(只不过不是Ra说的知晓自我,而是知晓reality)。感觉终极目的和Ra说的体验一切来知晓自我并没有差太多。。

所以,Zubiri说的成长成人应该不是传统意义说的“玩腻了”,因为作为人我可以自由选择 感受 它为 无聊透顶的(因此反应是不在乎)/或者感受它为整个宇宙最爽的(因此反应是很在乎?)。

这和自欺欺人好像也有很大区别:一个是在时间里的一个过程,另一种的 选择感受 是一个整体

所以Zubiri也没有终极答案,只是走出了从动物成长成人的一步,但没有解释人作为人 为什么 自由选择这些。

添加修改:这和灵魂在密度宇宙选择不同的人生体验也是有区别的,一个是被动技能(passive occasion),一个是主动技能。或者说一个是水龙头,一个是水源?

地球是密度世界和耶和华世界的根基,与地球经历了一系列事件和时间才形成是不冲突的,历史上发生的事件都要满足地球是根基这一事实。不光基督教的耶和华想摧毁地球(即HINTON的自我献祭),密度世界的大造物者,开辟这个空间的次级造物者在之前都想摧毁地球,开辟这个空间的造物者说非常后悔创造这个完全自由的空间,但是没有回头路了。但这都是从历史的角度看,真正的角度是地球说出了第一声Be,产生了第一个sentient intellection,才有了各种世界的可能。

至于摧毁会不会担因果的问题,据我了解世界存在natural causalities和personal causality,由于人类还未成长,所以人与人之间的causality不是很明显?所以可能表层看不到任何因果的迹象,深层还是有因果的?

我记得以前邦联说过句话:地球是几乎唯一一个正面势力和负面势力势均力敌的星球;

现在地球是密度宇宙和耶和华宇宙势均力敌的星球,在密度宇宙地球人不do as we like,因此和密度宇宙格格不入却与耶和华宇宙契合;但在耶和华宇宙,地球人不like耶和华like的却拥有密度宇宙的passion。

以后通过新的progession产生新的生物和宇宙了(即产生新的mind了,Ra说的spirit),地球仍然是谁都不偏不倚,这不是巧合,因为地球是field-reality,是根基。但是通过progression投射出去探索的新生物反过来反哺field-reality,将会发生什么?可能现在的所有宇宙(包括密度宇宙,辩证法宇宙和耶和华宇宙)将成为新的field-reality。见:

With this we have put the finishing touches on what I proposed at the beginning of this second part of my study, viz. the examination of the field structure of intellective knowing, i.e., the structure of the sentient logos. It is a structure determined by the real as merely actualized in sentient intellection. But as we shall see, this structure is the commencement of a progress within reality and directed toward the real qua moment of the world, understanding by ‘world’ the respective unity of the real purely and simply as real. The logos is a movement but not a progression. We are dealing with an enormous effort of intellection of what the real is, vaster at each iteration.

又想到了一个点:

整个密度宇宙只有地球是切实把环境当成真的不能再真的现实;同样,耶和华宇宙发言人Hinton的putting phenomenon for fact(把现象当现实)也是在弱化地球的现实的真实性。

但他们两个宇宙弱化地球的现实的真实性是有原因的:他们确实认为我们的环境是Illusion.这里还没有搞太懂,但是和Zubiri说的apprehension in reality(地球)和apprehension beyond reality(其他所有地方)有关。